
Challenge: Position the community medical center as a clinical research partner with an NCI-designated Cancer Center; facilitate a collaborative relationship to achieve the university’s academic, funding and research goals while sustaining the community hospital’s patient volumes, private physician practices and market prominence.
This region’s geographic location, historic cultural cordiality, and acknowledged market symbiosis enabled all participants - as well as the consultants and those on the Board - to commit to a higher level of community-academic integration and leadership collaboration. The engagement included accommodating two cancer center facilities, access to community clinical practice patients, and highly charged local politics. During the engagement, The Oncology Group:
|
Challenge: Create a sustainable cancer services model in a small rural hospital with limited patient volume. Provide patients access to medical oncology and surgical care without extensive travel.
This healthcare institution provides a venue for two cancer care modalities – medical oncology and surgery. The medical center also operates breast imaging services including digital mammography and diagnostic ultrasound. Physician and administrative leaders sought to create a more cohesive service line approach to cancer care that better integrated all oncology care providers. To achieve these broad objectives, The Oncology Group recommended leaders:
|
Challenge: Assist leaders in this sophisticated, large volume cancer program - located in a smaller southern town - to expand its geographic reach within the region. The client operated within a newly built cancer center facility, with ties to a NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center, several other academic institutions, and a robust clinical research initiative. Their primary competition is a nearby city institution with an active oncology program.
Cancer program leaders, both physicians and administrators had successfully raised funds to create a show-stopper cancer center, in which two modalities operated through private practices. Leaders had developed a dynamic clinical research program and had robust referral relationships that provided four-figure analytic case volumes. The Oncology Group designed a series of small group participatory planning sessions, supplemented by a “Briefing Book” for each Steering Committee member. The Briefing Book contained relevant data, benchmarks, academic research, as well as planning models to ensure each participant was fully informed during planning sessions. Together the planning team:
|
Challenge: This religious-affiliated system included a large sophisticated urban hospital in a rust-belt city, a smaller urban hospital - bifurcated by a river and bridge - in a distinct neighborhood within the same city, and a newly constructed small hospital in a growing suburban location with no cancer program. Leaders first engaged The Oncology Group to assist them with developing a strategic vision and plan for cancer services to encompass all three institutions.
After completing this initial engagement, the same client called on TOG for two additional quick-succession projects. The healthcare system was interested in building a cancer center. The large urban hospital operated a sophisticated oncology program which includes BMT services; the other urban-based institution was smaller, but had also operated an ACoS-accredited hospital for a decade. However, both these institutions faced declining patient volumes for all services. The newer hospital was experiencing explosive patient volume growth, was located in an up-and-coming suburban region, but had no cancer care services, affiliated oncologists, nor radiation therapy equipment. Leaders called on The Oncology Group to:
Several engagements later, the healthcare system opened its new oncology center in the suburban location. The center is flourishing, and patient volumes and revenues continue to grow. |
Challenge: This venerable institution engaged in an extensive review of its cancer center operations and performance, including a competitor analysis, a market-share analysis, and an evaluation of referral relationships.
After several decades of NCI-designation, leaders began a strategic planning process to develop defined programs to improve their market position, structure, organization and operations. Goals were to:
The Oncology Group assisted leaders to develop functional small working groups that addressed two sectors – Business and Governance issues and Clinical Services Delivery issues. The Oncology Group planned and facilitated these working sessions. The meetings were all-encompassing as participants discussed and made decisions about how to achieve unanimity of purpose (embracing the cancer center and the sponsoring University SOM); the role of community-based oncologists within the academic cancer center; business and enterprise issues (e.g. billing and collection operations); addressing patient experience and amenity dissatisfactions; as well as new infrastructure options and business realities. This NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center enacted many of the decisions and operates today with a clinical research network that includes a number of the state’s community-based oncologists. The university program recently opened its new cancer center replete with patient satisfying amenities. |